Es soll innerhalb dieser. Die Simpsons und die Philosophie. Authors: William Irwin, Mark T. Conard, Aeon J. Homers Odyssee. Conard Goodreads Author Herausgeber ,. Skoble Herausgeber ,. William Irwin. Skoble Editor. Conard Goodreads Author Editor. I Simpson e la filosofia Hardcover.
De Homer, Os Paperback. Conard Goodreads Author. Simpsonlar ve Felsefe Paperback. Murat Saglam Translator. Der letzte Wille - Diese Fehler machen das Testament unwirksam. Mit dieser Wandfarbe im Schlafzimmer schlafen Sie am besten.
Jason Momoa und Lisa Bonet gehen getrennte Wege. Formel 1 Weltmeister Max Verstappen erneut auf Titeljagd. Wie man eine runde Tischdecke in nur 7 Schritten herstellt.
Load Error. War der Artikel interessant? In my personal opinion I think this book is very good. This book can be very hard to understand at times because of the big words and wordiness. This book would not be as complicated if you had a rather big vocabulary but,64 if you don't it can be smart to sometimes have a dictionary or thesaurus by your side when reading this book.
This book tells you how much there is to the show The Simpsons. This book talks about how The Simpsons sometimes refer to other topics of the time when the show was In my personal opinion I think this book is very good. This book talks about how The Simpsons sometimes refer to other topics of the time when the show was written or it can refer to something.
Like in this show it makes fun of Arnold Schwarzenegger. Another time when 52 this book refers to something is when the book refers to the "I'm just a bill" song from School House Rock is talked about by Lisa on how it is a clique 70's's television show for children.
There a lot of characters from The Simpsons that are mentioned in this book. Like for example this book talks about how hypocritical Mr.
Burns is. Another thing is how Homer Simpson is a immoral person. This book talks about many interesting things about like. For example it talks about how hypocrisy can sometimes be praiseworthy.
I highly recommend this book to any one is looking for a good book on Philosophy because even though this book is very hard to read and is related to The Simpsons it can still give you great Philosophical views of life. I do warn though you can get lost in this book easily with the bigger words so I recommend you have good contexts clue abilities or just have a dictionary beside because the words can sometimes be very confusing. On a scale of , 10 being the best I would give this book a just because it is very wordy.
But, besides that I think you should read it. It might change your view of how to live life or how to handle life. View 1 comment.
This is a book of essays all written by different people. They all deal with different topics, and some are much better than others. Burns, Satan, and Happiness" are probably the ones I liked the best.
Those 3 alone would have probably earned at least 4 stars, but when averaged out with rest of the book, I think it is 3 starts overall. Okay, so Nietzsche is the philosopher's bad boy, and Bart Simpson is Springfield's bad boy. Certainly Bart bucks authority, and he has rejected or perhaps never actually adopted traditional morality.
Trying to convince Mr. Burns to allow him to come along to retrieve the Flying Hellfish bonanza, for example, he says: "Can I go with you to get the treasure? I won't eat much and I don't know the difference between right and wrong.
Could Bart in some way be an exemplar of the Nietzschean reverse ideal? Alas, the answer is clearly no. More like 2. The essays are hit or miss, with the character studies about Marge's sense of moral duty or the deep unhappiness at the core of Mr.
Burns mostly being hits while the essays fumbling for an overarching theme or criticizing the show for not being consistent with its themes are mostly misses. Cover to cover reading, or even just reading in its entirety, More like 2. Cover to cover reading, or even just reading in its entirety, is not recommended. The last time I read a philosophy book was my sophomore year in college.
A light hearted journey through complicated philosophical themes through the Simpsons. In the end the book is a testament to the staying power of the Simpsons. It means something to everyone and it hits audiences at different levels allowing for different interpretations. Basically a little something for everyone from the high browed to the juvenile. It was a really good book, but some of the essays get kinda drawn out. This look at Simpsons and how it can be compared to philosophy, was honestly a bit of bore.
I may reread again at a later date. Good bedtime book and a bit more rigorous than I expected! I have a friend who is in the process of writing his dissertation in philosophy, and he said compilation essay books of this kind are written by grad students like him. He even got an essay published in one revolving around Man in the High Castle and philosophy.
They use the same examples from the Simpsons over and over, which is a bit tir Good bedtime book and a bit more rigorous than I expected! They use the same examples from the Simpsons over and over, which is a bit tiresome I wanted to laugh at a greater variety of memories of jokes from old episodes , and of course some essays are better than others.
I petered out with two essays and about forty pages to go. Oh, well. Night night. Feb 05, papilionna rated it really liked it Shelves: nice-reviews. Since this book consists of eleven essays by eleven different authors, it's kind of hard to rate as a whole. Most of the essays are easy to understand, even if you're not a philosophy expert. Two or three especially in the third part of the book were pretty hard to get through - if you, like me, have no more than basic knowledge of marxism and people like Roland Barthes -, but for the most part, I felt greatly entertained and educated reading this.
Heck, I felt reeeally smug reading this book Since this book consists of eleven essays by eleven different authors, it's kind of hard to rate as a whole. Heck, I felt reeeally smug reading this book in public.
0コメント